Post by mstjuste on Aug 25, 2021 21:58:08 GMT
Hi LA family,
I didn't get to share this but will potentially in a future discussion.
Having the conversation with Kenneth Brezenoff from our Legal Team this past Friday reminded me of something that I alluded to in our presentation for Agency Z - [which is that) FEDCAP considered all the risks.
The conversation with Kenneth also provided insight on how cost and long-term sustainability plays a role; something that I could have also added beyond playing the devil's advocate! In my post about Reputational Risk, my default debater sought to highlight reputational risk without acknowledging the fact that our system of checks and balances has already addressed and accounted for the concerns I shared. I wanted to present it as: "Here are the risks we face" and "Here are some concerns that arose", "Here are the risks we can take" and finally, "Here's how I recommend we mitigate that risk." I failed to provide a balanced presentation in my post which if I wasn't rushing and pressed for time/the deadline would have provided all points of view, all strengths/weaknesses objectively. I even referenced the FDA who in fact fully backs administering the Pfizer vaccine. As I re-read my post I asked myself "Did I just post that?" I have total faith in Fedcap Leadership which is why I chose to be a part of this team. In fact, I can be counted on to play my part in making this transition to a fully-vaccinated workforce a very efficient and smooth one. Loving this module and looking forward to what's next!
I didn't get to share this but will potentially in a future discussion.
Having the conversation with Kenneth Brezenoff from our Legal Team this past Friday reminded me of something that I alluded to in our presentation for Agency Z - [which is that) FEDCAP considered all the risks.
The conversation with Kenneth also provided insight on how cost and long-term sustainability plays a role; something that I could have also added beyond playing the devil's advocate! In my post about Reputational Risk, my default debater sought to highlight reputational risk without acknowledging the fact that our system of checks and balances has already addressed and accounted for the concerns I shared. I wanted to present it as: "Here are the risks we face" and "Here are some concerns that arose", "Here are the risks we can take" and finally, "Here's how I recommend we mitigate that risk." I failed to provide a balanced presentation in my post which if I wasn't rushing and pressed for time/the deadline would have provided all points of view, all strengths/weaknesses objectively. I even referenced the FDA who in fact fully backs administering the Pfizer vaccine. As I re-read my post I asked myself "Did I just post that?" I have total faith in Fedcap Leadership which is why I chose to be a part of this team. In fact, I can be counted on to play my part in making this transition to a fully-vaccinated workforce a very efficient and smooth one. Loving this module and looking forward to what's next!
